Social Redistribution, Not Digital Infrastructure, Drives Climate-Conscious Behavior Among Professional Uniform Wearers : Evidence from India's Hospitality and Retail Sectors

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2026/v56/i9/176090

Keywords:

circular economy, professional uniforms, workwear, climate-conscious behavior, social redistribution, PLS-SEM, India.
Publishing Chronology: Paper Submission Date : October 25, 2025 ; Paper sent back for Revision : June 15, 2026 ; Paper Acceptance Date : July 30, 2026 ; Paper Published Online : September 15, 2026.

Abstract

Purpose : Professional uniforms are issued to well over 110 million workers in India across retail, hospitality, healthcare, and allied sectors, yet remain almost absent from the circular economy literature. This study identified which dimension of a Circular Textile Program (CTP) – textile recycling, digital tracking, circular performance monitoring, or social redistribution – most strongly drove climate-conscious behavior among professional uniform wearers, and estimated the scale of climate mitigation a sector-wide rollout could plausibly achieve.

Design/Methodology/Approach : A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design combined a stratified, simulated dataset (n = 350), calibrated against 12 peer-reviewed structural equation modeling studies and analyzed with PLS-SEM, with a thematic analysis of five operating workwear-circularity programs among hospitality and retail employees in India.

Findings : All structural paths were supported. Contrary to the infrastructure-first assumption dominant in circular economy research, social redistribution, not digital tracking or recycling capacity, carried the largest path coefficient toward climate-conscious workforce behavior (β = 0.51, p < 0.001), and its effect on climate mitigation outcomes was fully mediated by behavioral transformation (β = 0.33, p < 0.001), together explaining up to 71% of variance in workforce-level climate consciousness. Scenario modeling built on these simulated parameters indicated that CTP adoption across 30% of India’s organized hospitality and retail workforce could divert roughly 24,000 tonnes of workwear waste and 76,800 tonnes of CO2e annually.

Practical Implications : These results, provisional pending primary field validation, reposition circular textile policy around the social architecture of exchange rather than technological throughput. Employer-issued uniform programs should treat redistribution and reissue as the primary design variable, with direct relevance to India's Panchamrit climate commitments, its draft Extended Producer Responsibility framework for textiles, and SEBI’s Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting mandate for large listed employers.

Originality/Value : To our knowledge, this is the first study to test a structural model of CTP dimensions among professional or occupational uniform wearers rather than school-based or general consumer populations, and the first to isolate social redistribution, rather than digital or recycling infrastructure, as the dominant driver of climate-conscious workforce behavior.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026-09-15

How to Cite

Bhalla, S., & Raghav, N. (2026). Social Redistribution, Not Digital Infrastructure, Drives Climate-Conscious Behavior Among Professional Uniform Wearers : Evidence from India’s Hospitality and Retail Sectors. Indian Journal of Marketing, 56(9), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2026/v56/i9/176090

References

1) Agrawal, D. (2025). Advancing inclusivity and workforce diversity through sustainable tourism. Environment, Social and Governance Insights, 1(2), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.64006/esgi/1202

2) Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

3) Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

4) Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Del Vecchio, P., Oropallo, E., & Secundo, G. (2022). Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain. Information & Management, 59(7), 103508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103508

5) Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

6) Dahiya, A., Bhatt, P., Kumar, A., & Kant, S. (2025). Factors influencing green product purchase intention: A structural equation modeling approach utilizing PEST framework. Indian Journal of Marketing, 55(8), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2025/v55/i8/175210

7) Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

8) Devi, T. R., & Kamei, G. (2025). Impact of climate change on psychological well-being of indigenous people: A narrative review. Pure & Applied Psychology Research Insights, 1(2), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.64006/papri/1202

9) Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

10) Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2023). The circular economy in detail. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org

11) Essential Workwear. (2026). Uniform recycling: Sustainable uniform solutions [Blog]. https://essentialworkwear.com/blog/uniform-recycling/

12) Fernandes, S., Sathish, M., & Shrivastava, P. (2024). Effect of consciousness in sustainable consumption habits on purchase intention of green products: Comparison study between India and USA. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(10), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i10/174602

13) Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

14) Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

15) Hosta, M., & Zabkar, V. (2021). Antecedents of environmentally and socially responsible sustainable consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04416-0

16) IBEF (India Brand Equity Foundation). (2025). Retail industry in India. https://www.ibef.org/industry/retail-india

17) Islam, M. M., Perry, P., & Gill, S. (2021). Mapping environmentally sustainable practices in textiles, apparel and fashion industries: A systematic literature review. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 25(2), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2020-0130

18) Katyal, S., Kumar, D., & Lal, R. (2025). Educational branding through Instagram influencers: Effectiveness of collaborative approaches. Media Education (Mediaobrazovanie), 21(3), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.13187/me.2025.3.298

19) Khanna, I., Mehra, P., & Abbott, S. (2025). Economic dynamics of decarbonization, innovation and resilience in the built environment. Environment, Social and Governance Insights, 1(2), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.64006/esgi/1205

20) Maheshwari, A., Buddhapriya, S., Soni, T. K., & Pareek, A. (2026). Transforming green HRM research for environmental sustainability: A comprehensive analysis of theoretical underpinnings and nomological network in the service sector. Indian Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2026/v56/i2/175256

21) Mane, N., & Lal, R. (2021). Use of folk media to create health awareness about tuberculosis. Pragyaan: Journal of Mass Communication, 19(2), 12.

22) Naaz, F. (2025). The climate-displacement nexus in India: Drivers, outcomes, and policy challenges. Policy, Law and Governance Insights, 1(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.64006/plgi/1101

23) Rahisha & Jamshed, M. (2025). Digital banking and sustainable finance: A topic modeling study. Environment, Social and Governance Insights, 1(2), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.64006/esgi/1204

24) Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2022). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com

25) Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

26) Routray, M., & Giri, A. (2024). Impact of "green fuel promotion" on customer buying behavior in Indian retail fuel outlets: A mix-method approach using fsQCA and NVIVO. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(11), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i11/174631

27) Shaika, S., Lal, R., & Jonjua, M. (2021). Sustainable Development Goal 3: Case study of using folk media as a potent tool in India. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(1), 4426–4443.

28) Sharma, D. (2023, December 11). The uniform code: A sector poised for growth. Apparel Resources. https://apparelresources.com/business-news/manufacturing/the-uniform-code-a-sector-poised-for-growth

29) Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. SAGE Publications.

30) Sreenivas, H., & Thadani, M. (2024, September 16). India's hospitality industry poised for sustained growth. Hotelivate. https://www.hotelivate.com/travel-tourism/sizing-up-indian-hospitality/

31) Statista. (2024). India: Employment in travel and tourism 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1094224/india-employment-in-travel-and-tourism-sector/

32) UNEP. (2020). Sustainability and circularity in the textile value chain: Global stocktaking. United Nations Environment Programme.

33) Zaidi, S. W., Khan, S. M., Azeem, M., & Ola, O. (2025). Examining the influence of organizational work climate on employee performance in India. Business Strategy and Management Insights, 1(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.64006/bsmi/1105