Factors Affecting Reversal of Plant-Based Meat Consumption : An Empirical Analysis

Authors

  •   Kunal Gadkari Doctoral Student (Corresponding Author), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune - 412 115, Maharashtra
  •   Tripti Dhote Assistant Professor, Symbiosis Institute of Digital and Telecom Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune - 412 115, Maharashtra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2025/v55/i3/174834

Keywords:

plant-based meat

, reversal, sustainable marketing, sensory perceptions.

Paper Submission Date

, July 27, 2024, Paper sent back for Revision, February 14, 2025, Paper Acceptance Date, February 20, Paper Published Online, March 15, 2025

Abstract

Purpose : This study showed how sustainable marketing, sensory perceptions, and consumer switching from plant-based to animal-based foods interacted. It examined how sustainable marketing and sensory impressions mediated psychological factors—desire, dissonance, and disillusion—on dietary choices and their impact on sustainable food practices.

Design/Methodology/Approach : The study analyzed 185 random samples over two months using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).

Findings : PLS-SEM showed that sensory perceptions and sustainable marketing significantly moderated psychological variables’ effect on dietary reversal. Positive sensory experiences helped plant-based diets stick since sensory impressions significantly inhibit reversion. Sustainable marketing improved sensory impressions but reduced dietary reversals. These findings showed that sensory and marketing methods were essential for dietary impact.

Limitations/Implications : Future research could examine digital marketing strategies’ qualitative and long-term effects on sustainable dietary preferences across diverse cultural contexts to improve global understanding and industry application.

Practical Implications : This study helped marketers and policymakers develop methods that used sensory appeal and sustainability claims to switch consumers to more sustainable diets.

Originality/Value : The research provided a framework for focused marketing techniques that encouraged plant-based diets and improved consumer behavior in sustainable food consumption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-03-15

How to Cite

Gadkari, K., & Dhote, T. (2025). Factors Affecting Reversal of Plant-Based Meat Consumption : An Empirical Analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 55(3), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2025/v55/i3/174834

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Alamanos, E., Bourlakis, M., & Tzimitra-Kalogianni, I. (2013). Segmenting Greek tomato consumers: Policy and marketing insights towards a healthy diet. British Food Journal, 115(4), 488–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701311317801

Ali, J., Kapoor, S., & Moorthy, J. (2010). Buying behaviour of consumers for food products in an emerging economy. British Food Journal, 112(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701011018806

Apostolidis, C., & McLeay, F. (2019). To meat or not to meat? Comparing empowered meat consumers' and anti-consumers' preferences for sustainability labels. Food Quality and Preference, 77, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.04.008

Austgulen, M. H., Skuland, S. E., Schjøll, A., & Alfnes, F. (2018). Consumer readiness to reduce meat consumption for the purpose of environmental Sustainability: Insights from Norway. Sustainability, 10(9), 3058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093058

Bash, M., Bandyopadhyay, A., Pahari, M. P., & Pahari, S. (2024). The effect of social media influencers on visit intention in the restaurant industry. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(5), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i5/173829

Biermann, G., & Rau, H. (2020). The meaning of meat: (Un)sustainable eating practices at and out of home. Appetite, 153, Article ID 104730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104730

Bryant, C., & Sanctorum, H. (2021). Alternative proteins, evolving attitudes: Comparing consumer attitudes to plant-based and cultured meat in Belgium in two consecutive years. Appetite, 161, Article ID 105161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105161

De Boer, J., & Aiking, H. (2017). Pursuing a low meat diet to improve both health and Sustainability: How can we use the frames that shape our meals? Ecological Economics, 142, 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.037

Dsouza, K. J., Shetty, A., & Pillai, R. K. (2024). Agritourism as the epitome of India's sustainability culture: A narrative review. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(7), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i7/174015

Fernandes, A. M., Costa, L. T., de Souza Teixeira, O., dos Santos, F. V., Revillion, J. P., & de Souza, Â. R. (2021). Consumption behaviour and purchase intention of cultured meat in the capital of the "state of barbecue," Brazil. British Food Journal, 123(9), 3032–3055. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2020-0698

Fiorentini, M., Kinchla, A. J., & Nolden, A. A. (2020). Role of sensory evaluation in consumer acceptance of plant-based meat analogues and meat extenders: A scoping review. Foods, 9(9), 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091334

Font-i-Furnols, M., & Guerrero, L. (2014). Consumer preference, behaviour and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Science, 98(3), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.025

Grahl, S., Palanisamy, M., Strack, M., Meier-Dinkel, L., Toepfl, S., & Mörlein, D. (2018). Towards more sustainable meat alternatives: How technical parameters affect the sensory properties of extrusion products derived from soy and algae. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 962–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.041

Graves, C., & Roelich, K. (2021). Psychological barriers to pro-environmental behaviour change: A review of meat consumption behaviours. Sustainability, 13(21), 11582. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111582

Happer, C., & Wellesley, L. (2019). Meat consumption, behaviour and the media environment: A focus group analysis across four countries. Food Security, 11, 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0877-1

Jain, A., & Jain, P. (2024). Shifting consumer attitudes and willingness to pay for premium products — The case of Unibic cookies. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i3/173566

Jallinoja, P., Niva, M., & Latvala, T. (2016). Future of sustainable eating? Examining the potential for expanding bean eating in a meat-eating culture. Futures, 83, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.006

Jusmaliani, J., & Nasution, H. (2021). Religiosity aspect in consumer behaviour: Determinants of halal meat consumption. ASEAN Marketing Journal, 1(1), Article no. 1. https://doi.org/10.21002/amj.v1i1.1977

Kalavadia, K., & Debnath, R. (2024). Analyzing the attributes for Ice Cream purchase decisions among Generation Z consumers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(12), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i12/174660

Kaljonen, M., Peltola, T., Salo, M., & Furman, E. (2019). Attentive, speculative experimental research for sustainability transitions: An exploration in sustainable eating. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.206

Khattri, V., & Tomar, V. S. (2024). Does greenwashing build green brand associations? Evidence from the Indian packaged food market. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i2/172049

Kim, Y., & Park, S.-Y. (2009). Reverse acculturation: A new cultural phenomenon examined through an emerging wedding practice of Korean Americans in the United States. Family & Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 37(3), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X08330758

Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behaviour. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.003

Kumar, S., & Jain, E. (2024). Role of the theory of planned behaviour in interpreting sustainable consumption behaviour: A meta-analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(10), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i10/174605

Mohan, K., Maheswarappa, N. B., & Banerjee, R. (2022). Exploring the dynamics of women consumer preference, attitude and behaviour towards meat and meat products consumption in India. Meat Science, 193, Article ID 108926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108926

Montesdeoca, C. C., Suárez, E., Hernández, B., & Rolo-González, G. (2022). Meat-free diets and their relationship with the meaning of food and eco-friendly purchase and consumption behaviours. British Food Journal, 124(9), 2761–2771. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2021-0309

Mylan, J. (2018). Sustainable consumption in everyday life: A qualitative study of UK consumer experiences of meat reduction. Sustainability, 10(7), 2307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072307

Niva, M., Mäkelä, J., Kahma, N., & Kjærnes, U. (2014). Are you eating sustainably? Practices and background factors of ecological food consumption in four Nordic countries. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9270-4

Paiva, T., Jacinto, T. A., Sarraguça, M. C., & Coutinho, P. (2022). Beef consumers behaviour and preferences—The case of Portugal. Sustainability, 14(4), 2358. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042358

Petrescu, D. C., & Petrescu-Mag, R. M. (2018). Consumer behaviour related to Rabbit meat as a functional food. World Rabbit Science, 26(4), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2018.10435

Ramanathan, R., Suman, S. P., & Faustman, C. (2020). Biomolecular interactions governing fresh meat colour in post-mortem skeletal muscle: A review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 68(46), 12779–12787. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b08098

Sen, S. (2024). Influence of external and situational stimulus factors on impulse buying: A stimulus-organism-response framework. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(5), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i5/173830

Twine, R. (2018). Materially constituting a sustainable food transition: The case of vegan eating practice. Sociology, 52(1), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517726647