Measuring Service Quality and Farmers’ Satisfaction in e-National Agricultural Market Using the SERVQUAL Model

Authors

  •   Ramakrishna Bandaru Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce and International Business, School of Business Studies, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod - 671 320, Kerala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i1/173383

Keywords:

e-National Agriculture Market (e-NAM)

, farmers, SERVQUAL model, satisfaction, tangibility

Paper Submission Date

, October 25, 2022, Paper sent back for Revision, July 15, 2023, Paper Acceptance Date, September 25, Paper Published Online, January 15, 2024

Abstract

Purpose : The Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, developed the Electronic National Agriculture Market (e-NAM), an online platform that allows farmers to sell their produce throughout the nation. A total of 1,361 Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs) in 23 states and 4 union territories provide e-NAM services. It has been observed that only a few markets have been implementing the e-NAM services effectively. According to a literature review, farmers do not generally accept or use the e-NAM services. This study used the SERVQUAL methodology to quantify the relationship between service quality characteristics and the farmers’ e-NAM satisfaction levels.

Methodology : The SERVQUAL model was utilized to examine the association between farmers’ satisfaction and SERVQUAL dimensions. Primary data were gathered from farmers who were registered participants in the Telangana and Odisha e-NAM implementation markets. Approximately 241 samples were chosen by a basic random sampling method. The path model and confirmatory factor analysis were created using AMOS software.

Findings : According to the study, farmers’ satisfaction levels are largely influenced by just three SERVQUAL model dimensions: assurance, reliability, and tangibility.

Practical Implications : The Ministry of Agriculture must provide the State agriculture marketing authorities with the necessary policy guidelines in order to fortify the three highly consequential SERVQUAL dimensions in each e-NAM implementing market: Assurance (lessening of intermediaries, information of price and market conditions, assignment, grading, etc.), reliability (best price, intertrading, e-bidding, etc.), and tangibility (computers, electronic weight, handheld machines, and restrooms).

Originality : In contrast to other studies on the e-NAM, the current study examined the relationship between the electronic National Agriculture Market’s service quality aspects and farmers’ satisfaction levels by building on the SERVQUAL model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-01-01

How to Cite

Bandaru, R. (2024). Measuring Service Quality and Farmers’ Satisfaction in e-National Agricultural Market Using the SERVQUAL Model. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i1/173383

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Alqeed, M. A. (2013). Service quality relationship with customer satisfaction and business profitability (A case study of Royal Jordanian). European Journal of Business and Management, 5(1), 210–216. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234624521.pdf

Bandaru, R. (2019). e - national agricultural market in India: An effective implementation and farmers' attraction path model. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(6), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i6/144699

Bisen, J., & Kumar, R. (2018). Agricultural marketing reforms and e-national agricultural market (e-NAM) in India: A review. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 31, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2018.00032.0

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Taylor & Francis Group.

Chand, R. (2012). Development policies and agricultural markets. Economic & Political Weekly, 47(52), 53–63. https://www.epw.in/journal/2012/52/review-rural-affairs-reviewissues/development-policies-and-agricultural-markets

Chand, R. (2016). e-Platform for national agricultural market. Economic & Political Weekly, 51(28), 15–18.

Chaudhary, S., & Suri, P. K. (2022). A multivariate analysis of agricultural electronic trading adoption. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 81(9), 932–939. https://doi.org/10.56042/jsir.v81i09.59538

Chella Baskar, V. D., & Shalendra (eds.). (2022). Agricultural market in India: Reforms for a liberal and competitive system. National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE) & Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University. https://www.manage.gov.in/publications/eBooks/Agricultural%20Marketing%20in%20India.pdf

Dey, K. (2016). National Agricultural Market: Rationale, roll-out and ramifications. Economic & Political Weekly, 51(19), 35–39. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44003474

Ezealaji, N. L., & Adenegan, K. O. (2014). The role of agricultural market reform in enhancing farmers' income in Nigeria. African Journal of Marketing Management, 6(3), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMM2011.025

Gupta, S., & Badal, P. S. (2018). E-national agricultural market (e-NAM) in India: A review. BHU Management Review, 6(1&2), 48–57.

Hair, J. F., Black W., Babin, B. Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hamed Omar, H. F., Saadan, K. B., & Seman, K. B. (2015). Determining the influence of the reliability of service quality on customer satisfaction: The case of Libyan e-commerce customers. International Journal of Learning & Development, 5(1), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v5i1.6649

ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management. (2022). Annual report-2022. https://naarm.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/annual_report_2022.pdf

Kalamkar, S. S., Kinjal, A., & Bhaiya, S. R. (2019). Electronic National Agricultural Market (eNAM) in Gujarat: Review of performance and prospects (AERC Report No. 177). Agro-Economic Research Centre. https://www.spuvvn.edu/academic_centres/agro_economic_centre/research_studies/177_Electronic_National_Agricultural_Market_(eNAM)_in_Gujarat.pdf

Karim, M. M. (2020). SERVQUAL model for measuring customer satisfaction: An analysis of quantitative data. Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research, 4(12), 117–125. https://ideas.repec.org/a/nap/nijbmr/2020p117-125.html

Karthick, S., Saminathan, R., & Gopinath, R. (2020). Agricultural marketing - An overview. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(11), 3007–3013. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HN98A

Kathayat, B. (2019). Performance of regulated markets in Odisha under new agricultural marketing reforms regime. Economic Affairs, 64(2), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.30954/0424-2513.2.2019.3

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). The Guilford Press.

Kumar, R., Kumar, S., Meena, P. C., Kumar, B. G., & Sivaramane, N. (2020). Strengthening ENAM in India: Way forward. ICAR National Academy of Agricultural Research Management. https://naarm.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2020_eNAM_Report.pdf

National Commission on Farmers, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer Welfare. (2006). Serving farmers and saving farmers. https://agriwelfare.gov.in/sites/default/files/NCF3%20%281%29.pdf

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403

Purty, L., & Khatua, P. (2020). Problems and prospects of agriculture marketing for sustainable development in India - An analysis. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 11(2), 312–315. https://jespublication.com/upload/2020-1102044.pdf

Raju, M. S., Devy, M. R., & Gopal, P. V. (2022). Knowledge of farmers on functioning of e-NAM. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 58(2), 26–29. http://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2022.58205

Reddy, A. A. (2018). Electronic national agricultural markets: The way forward. Current Science, 115(5), 826–837. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v115/i5/826-837

Sekhar, C. S., & Bhatt, Y. (2018). Electronic national agricultural market (e-NAM): A review of performance and prospects in Haryana (Research Study No. 2018/01). Agricultural Economics Research Centre. https://aerc.du.ac.in/userfiles/downloads/pdffiles/Report_Final_AERC_Delhi_eNAM-2018.pdf

Singh, L., & Goyal, M. (2020). Status of national agriculture market (eNAM) in Punjab. International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, 11(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.15740/has/irjaes/11.2/118-126

Singh, S. R., Pant, S. C., & Sathyendra, A. D. (2020). Performance evaluation of e-national agriculture market. CCS National Institute of Agricultural Marketing. https://ccsniam.gov.in/images/pdfs/Evaluation.pdf

Srithar, P., Bairavi, N., & Mariselvam, G. (2016). E-platform in Indian agricultural market - An agriculture reforms. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 4(5), 925–927. https://www.ijair.org/administrator/components/com_jresearch/files/publications/IJAIR_1906_FINAL.pdf

Van der Doef, M., & Maes, S. (1999). The job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work & Stress, 13(2), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/026783799296084

Wang, L. W., & Le, Q. L. (2015). Customer satisfaction towards online shopping at electronics shopping malls in Vietnam - A conceptual model to enhance business success through efficient websites and logistics services. Journal of Stock & Forex Trading, 5(1), 1000164. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9458.1000164

Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis (3rd ed.). Harper & Row.