Perceived Intrusiveness and Digital Audience : An Empirical Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i7/174016Keywords:
Digital ads
, privacy, intrusiveness, disruption, awareness, online.Paper Submission Date
, September 25, 2023, Paper sent back for Revision, March 26, 2024, Paper Acceptance Date, April 20, Paper Published Online, July 15, 2024Abstract
Purpose : Since some advertising set-ups are considered obtrusive by consumers, the way that they perceive advertising has become more and more sophisticated. Finding consumer knowledge of and reaction to different types of online audience intrusiveness in digital media ads was the aim of this study.
Methodology : The study administered a purposive approach to investigate intrusive advertisements and consumer awareness and responses. The sample was collected from 381 samples from Bahrain and India through a structured questionnaire. The results were analyzed by inferring a structural equation model, regression, and descriptive statistics through Smart PLS and SPSS.
Findings : The results indicated that consumers are unaware of privacy invasion arising from digital marketing advertisement technology like facial recognition, eye tracking, and GPS tracking; however, they are aware of privacy invasion occurring through social media. The results explored that online ads are considered intrusive, and consumers deliberately do not pay attention to the ads on social networking services.
Practical Implications : The advertisers and practitioners carefully assess which internet advertising type is to be used based on the goal of their campaign. In the days of the information age, it is essential to evaluate consumers’ preferences and choices and provide them with more relevant communications by owing to knowledge about users’ navigational behaviors.
Originality : The study contributed to the field of digital media advertisement by linking perceived consumer instructiveness. The outcome of the study proposed a framework for future research by focusing on the research gap and key findings in this domain.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Abbasi, A. Z., Rehman, U., Ting, D. H., & Quraishi, M. A. (2022). Do pop-up ads in online videogames influence children's inspired-to behavior? Young Consumers, 23(3), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-06-2021-1347
Arora, N., Rana, M., & Prashar, S. (2023). Empathy toward social media advertisements: The moderating role of ad intrusiveness. Journal of Promotion Management, 29(4), 535–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2022.2163038
Avérous, V., & Galichon, I. (2021). A narrative clinic of palliative care: Creative or intrusive writing? Ethics & Health, 18(4), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etiqe.2021.09.004
Belanche, D., Flavián, C., & Pérez-Rueda, A. (2020). Brand recall of skippable vs non-skippable ads in YouTube: Readapting information and arousal to active audiences. Online Information Review, 44(3), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2019-0035
Berry, L.-M., & Laskey, B. (2012). A review of obsessive intrusive thoughts in the general population. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 1(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2012.02.002
Biswas, W. (2023). Rewriting and redefining the aspects of marketing with metaverse – A brief insight. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(3), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i3/172057
Chandel, A., Sethi, A., & Mishra, P. (2017). A comparative study of Facebook marketing practices of selected theme based restaurants in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(12), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i12/119901
Chang, H. H., Rizal, H., & Amin, H. (2013). The determinants of consumer behavior towards email advertisement. Internet Research, 23(3), 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241311331754
Cheung, J., & Bryant, R. A. (2017). The impact of appraisals on intrusive memories. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 54, 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.07.005
Coker, K. K., Flight, R. L., & Baima, D. M. (2021). Video storytelling ads vs argumentative ads: How hooking viewers enhances consumer engagement. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 607–622. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-05-2020-0115
Cordero-Gutiérrez, R., & Lahuerta-Otero, E. (2020). Social media advertising efficiency on higher education programs. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 24(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-09-2019-0075
Dondzilo, L., Grafton, B., Zaffino, J., & MacLeod, C. (2022). The independent roles of attentional engagement with, and disengagement from, negative information in intrusive re-experiencing of negative events. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 75, 101722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2021.101722
Feng, Y., & Xie, Q. (2018). Privacy concerns, perceived intrusiveness, and privacy controls: An analysis of virtual try-on apps. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1521317
Gautam, S., Malik, P., & Jain, S. (2022). Role of trusting beliefs and trust in the adoption of online reviews of hotels: Extension of the IAM model. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(11), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i11/172431
Gutierrez, A., O'Leary, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Calle, T. (2019). Using privacy calculus theory to explore entrepreneurial directions in mobile location-based advertising: Identifying intrusiveness as the critical risk factor. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.015
Guzey, M., Funk, J., Kustermann, J., & Ehring, T. (2021). The effect of concreteness training on peri-traumatic processing and intrusive memories following an analogue trauma. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 147, 103970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2021.103970
Hirsimäki, M., Alavesa, P., & Arhippainen, L. (2021). Between beats: Linking player engagement to advertisement frequency and intrusiveness. In J. Roningand & T. Shatalova (eds.), 30th Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT (pp. 71–78). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.23919/FRUCT53335.2021.9599998
Huber, R. A., Wicki, M. L., & Bernauer, T. (2019). Public support for environmental policy depends on beliefs concerning effectiveness, intrusiveness, and fairness. Environmental Politics, 29(4), 649–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1629171
Jackson, D. B., Testa, A., & Vaughn, M. G. (2020). Low self-control and the adolescent police stop: Intrusiveness, emotional response, and psychological well-being. Journal of Criminal Justice, 66, 101635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.101635
Jankowski, J., Lewandowska, A., Wątróbski, J., Ziemba, P., & Salabun, W. (2016). Modeling the perceptual response from effects oriented web components towards lower intrusiveness. Procedia Computer Science, 96, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.08.120
Ketelaar, P. E., Bernritter, S. F., van Woudenberg, T. J., Rozendaal, E., Konig, R. P., Hühn, A. E., van Gisbergen, M. S., & Janssen, L. (2018). “Opening†location-based mobile ads: How openness and location congruency of location-based ads weaken negative effects of intrusiveness on brand choice. Journal of Business Research, 91, 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.018
Le, C. X., & Wang, H. (2020). Integrative perceived values influencing consumers' attitude and behavioral responses toward mobile location-based advertising: An empirical study in Vietnam. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 33(1), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-08-2019-0475
Li, H., Edwards, S. M., & Lee, J.-H. (2002). Measuring the intrusiveness of advertisements: Scale development and validation. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673665
Mahé, G., Suzumura, G. G., Moisan, L., & Suyama, R. (2022). A non intrusive audio clarity index (NIAC) and its application to blind source separation. Signal Processing, 194, 108448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108448
Malhotra, G., Mishra, S., & Saxena, G. (2021). Consumers' psychological reactance and ownership in in-game advertising. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(6), 842–855. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-09-2020-0419
McCoy, S., Everard, A., Galletta, D. F., & Moody, G. D. (2017). Here we go again! The impact of website ad repetition on recall, intrusiveness, attitudes, and site revisit intentions. Information & Management, 54(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.03.005
Menon, P. B. (2021). Influence of social media marketing efforts on brand equity and consumer response to branded shoes in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 51(9), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2021/v51/i9/166162
Mishra, S., & Malhotra, G. (2021). The gamification of in-game advertising: Examining the role of psychological ownership and advertisement intrusiveness. International Journal of Information Management, 61, 102245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102245
Nandi, S., & Prasad, S. S. (2024). Customer engagement marketing and firms' deliberation on e-word of mouth communication on online platforms: A study on millennials and zoomers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i1/173380
Niu, X., Wang, X., & Liu, Z. (2021). When I feel invaded, I will avoid it: The effect of advertising invasiveness on consumers' avoidance of social media advertising. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102320
Nyström, A.-G., & Mickelsson, K.-J. (2019). Digital advertising as service: Introducing contextually embedded selling. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(4), 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2018-0043
Olagunju, A. T., Bioku, A. A., Ohaeri, J. U., Oluwaniyi, S. O., Li, A., Olagunju, T. O., Esezobor, C. I., Onwuameze, O. E., & Chaimowitz, G. A. (2021). A comparative study of perceived burden in parent caregivers of adolescents with epilepsy in a resource-restricted setting: Investigating the explanatory factors of perceived burden. Epilepsy & Behavior, 120, 107992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107992
Pfiffelmann, J., Dens, N., & Soulez, S. (2020). Personalized advertisements with integration of names and photographs: An eye-tracking experiment. Journal of Business Research, 111, 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.017
Prasad, S. S., & Amruta, Y. K. (2023). Influence of social media on post-purchase dissonance: An empirical study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(6), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i6/172766
Riedel, A. S., Weeks, C. S., & Beatson, A. T. (2018). Am I intruding? Developing a conceptualisation of advertising intrusiveness. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(9–10), 750–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1496130
Rodgers, S., & Thorson, E. (2017). Digital advertising: Theory and research (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623252
Schulz, R., Czaja, S. J., & Monin, J. K. (2014). Intrusive thoughts mediate the relation between perceived patient suffering and caregiver depression. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 10(4S, Part 3), p. 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.317
Sharma, D., Wang, Y., Naylor, P. A., & Brookes, M. (2016). A data-driven non-intrusive measure of speech quality and intelligibility. Speech Communication, 80, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2016.03.005
Shimpi, S. S. (2018). Social media as an effective marketing tool: An empirical study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(7), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i7/129725
Siji, S. (2021). Social commerce of Indian customers: Role of social media usage. Indian Journal of Marketing, 51(8), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2021/v51/i8/165760
Singh, L., Kanstrup, M., Gamble, B., Geranmayeh, A., Göransson, K. E., Rudman, A., Dahl, O., Lindström, V., Hörberg, A., Holmes, E. A., & Moulds, M. L. (2022). A first remotely-delivered guided brief intervention to reduce intrusive memories of psychological trauma for healthcare staff working during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 26, 100884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100884
Srivastava, S., Wilska, T.-A., & Nyrhinen, J. (2023). Awareness of digital commercial profiling among adolescents in Finland and their perspectives on online targeted advertisements. Journal of Children and Media, 17(4), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2023.2257813
Stavropoulos, A., & Berle, D. (2020). The influence of ruminative processing mode on the trajectory of intrusive memories following a negative mood induction. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 68, 101528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101528
Sung, E. (2020). Consumers' responses to mobile app advertisements during holiday periods. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(3), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2019-3137
Tustin, R. D., Pennington, B., & Byrne, M. (1994). Intrusiveness of interventions: Ratings by psychologists. Behaviour Change, 11(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0813483900004605
Van den Broeck, E., Poels, K., & Walrave, M. (2020). How do users evaluate personalized Facebook advertising? An analysis of consumer- and advertiser controlled factors. Qualitative Market Research, 23(2), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-10-2018-0125
Verberckmoes, S., Poels, K., Dens, N., Herrewijn, L., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2016). When and why is perceived congruity important for in-game advertising in fantasy games? Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.062
Wottrich, V. M., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Smit, E. G. (2018). The privacy trade-off for mobile app downloads: The roles of app value, intrusiveness, and privacy concerns. Decision Support Systems, 106, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.12.003
