Comparative Evaluation of Explainable AI Techniques for Histopathology-Based Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijcs/2026/v11/i4/176098Keywords:
Cancer Detection, Explainable Artificial Intelligence(XAI), Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, Histopathology Images, Hybrid
Publishing Chronology Paper Submission Date : June 3, 2026 ; Paper sent back for Revision : June 11, 2026 ; Paper Acceptance Date : June 15, 2026 ; Paper Published Online : August 5, 2026.
Abstract
The analysis of histopathological images is an important method of diagnosing cancer. Deep learning models, such as convolutional neural networks and transformer-based models have demonstrated great potential in automated cancer detection. However, they are black-box and cannot be understood in a clinical context. In this paper, a comparative study is conducted to analyze the explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approaches for cancer detection based on histopathology images on a hybrid model based on deep learning networks: ResNet-18 and Vision Transformer (ViT). The hybrid model is trained on histopathology images and three explainability mechanisms are used, including Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, and Score-CAM to visualize regions of decisions made. The created heatmaps are evaluated according to the accuracy of localization, noise minimization, and interpretability. Experimental results indicate that Grad-CAM++ provides better localization and Score-CAM generates more smooth and noisy explanations. This comparative analysis enhances transparency of models and helps to make more credible medical decisions.
Downloads
References
[1] M. Cooper, Z. Ji, and R. G. Krishnan, “Machine learning in computational histopathology: Challenges and opportunities,” Genes, Chromosomes Cancer, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 540–556, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1002/gcc.23177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.23177
[2] A. N. Mir, D. R. Rizvi, and M. R. Ahmad, “Enhancing histopathological image analysis: An explainable vision transformer approach with comprehensive interpretation methods and evaluation of explanation quality,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 149, p. 110519, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110519
[3] K. Anandhi and K. Karuppasamy, “Histopathological cancer detection using deep convolutional neural networks: A step toward transformer-based explainable AI models,” Degres , Paper Id:DEJ/1865, vol. 10, no. 11, p.1, Nov. 2025.
[4] A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly, J. Uszkoreit, N. Houlsby, and N. Houlsby, “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” in Int. Conf. Learn. Representations, 2021, doi: 0.48550/arXiv.2010.11929.
[5] K. Anandhi, K. Karuppasamy, and R. Sinduja, “A comparative study of CNN, Vision Transformer, and hybrid CNN-Transformer models for Histopathology-Based cancer detection,” Degres, Paper Id:DEJ/1938, vol. 10, no. 12, Dec. 2025, https://doi.org/10.528/zenodo.17115443.
[6] K. Anandhi, K. Karuppasamy, and R. Sinduja, “An explainable Hybrid CNN–Transformer framework for breast cancer detection from Histopathology images,” J. Ubiquitous Comput. Commun. Technologies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 37-46, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.36548/jucct.2026.1.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36548/jucct.2026.1.003
[7] R. R. Selvaraju, M. Cogswell, A. Das, R. Vedantam, D. Parikh, and D. Batra, “Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vision, pp. 618–626, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1610.02391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.74
[8] “Histopathologic cancer detection dataset,” Kaggle, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/histopathologic-cancer-detection.