Benchmarking and Performance Evaluation of Quantum AI Algorithms

Authors

  •   Talabattula Divya Sai Sri Akanksha Student, Department of CSE, Pragati Engineering College (Autonomous), D. No. 3-180, ADB Road, Surampalem, Near Peddapuram, Gandepalli Mandal, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh - 533 437 ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0510-5388
  •   Chodapuneedi Sowjanya Assistant Professor, Pragati Engineering College (Autonomous), D. No. 3-180, ADB Road, Surampalem, Near Peddapuram, Gandepalli Mandal, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh - 533 437 ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6785-7404
  •   Manjula Devarakonda Venkata Associate Professor, Pragati Engineering College (Autonomous), D. No. 3-180, ADB Road, Surampalem, Near Peddapuram, Gandepalli Mandal, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh - 533 437 ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0040-3726

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/ijcs/2026/v11/i4/176097

Keywords:

Performance, Quantum AI

Publishing Chronology Paper Submission Date : May 24, 2026 ; Paper sent back for Revision : June 8, 2026 ; Paper Acceptance Date : June 14, 2026 ; Paper Published Online : August 5, 2026.

Abstract

Quantum AI is a new way to think about the future of Artificial Intelligence through the merging of two technologies: quantum computing and advanced machine learning. Quantum AI has the potential to provide solutions to computationally difficult problems that traditional systems cannot solve. Quantum AI's continued success will rely on advancements in hybrid quantum-classical solutions, as well as the expansion of quantum hardware; hence, research remains necessary to conduct systematic benchmarks as well as performance analysis in order to determine both how well quantum AI algorithms perform practically, and where their limitations lie. In this chapter, detailed examinations of benchmarks that have been developed specifically for quantum AI are presented alongside evaluative metrics across various key areas of performance including algorithmic efficiency, scalability, noise immunity, and resource use for various types of quantum architectures. The chapter integrates dialogue between theory and practice to demonstrate ways in which performance metrics (i.e., quantum circuit depth, fidelity, convergence behaviour and computational complexity) can effectively compare Quantum AI algorithms to classical algorithms. Particular attention is given to hybrid variational algorithms, quantum-enhanced optimization algorithms, and quantum machine learning. Using benchmark datasets, simulation frameworks and new evaluation methods, there are several challenges in terms of reproducibility, hardware variability and algorithm/hardware co-design that emerge through analysis of the above metrics as well. Aside from focusing on a more broad view of how Performance Evaluation relates to developing more effective Quantum AI Solutions. In addition to viewing Benchmarking as a technical exercise solely, this chapter provides a more holistic view in relation to a human perspective of the situation.

This paper outlines how performance evaluation practices can be used as a considerable and well-designed means of bridging the gap between the promise of Quantum Technology at an abstract level, and the ability of Quantum Technology to produce tangible outcomes in the real world by adopting a more comprehensive Governance-oriented approach to Benchmarking Quantum AI Systems. The purpose of this chapter is to assist the growing community of researchers, practitioners, and Strategic Technology Professionals by providing them with a clear and structured framework for Evaluation of Quantum AI Algorithms. There is a significant focus of the chapter on establishing important reference points that organizations can use to determine when an intelligent system has successfully achieved a true and validated quantum advantage. The ultimate goal is to assist in guiding the responsible development and implementation of Quantum AI to enable the Potential Benefits of Quantum AI to be realized, in ways that are meaningful and impactful.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Akanksha, T. D. S. S., Sowjanya, C., & Venkata, M. D. (2026). Benchmarking and Performance Evaluation of Quantum AI Algorithms. Indian Journal of Computer Science, 11(4), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijcs/2026/v11/i4/176097

References

[1] M. K. Pasupuleti, “Quantum-enhanced machine learning: Harnessing quantum computing for next-generation AI systems,” Preprint, 2025, doi: 10.62311/nesx/rrv125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62311/nesx/rrv125

[2] M. Feng, L. H. Zaw, and T. S. Koh, “Two-qubit sweet spots for capacitively coupled exchange-only spin qubits,” npj Quantum Inf., vol. 7, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41534-021-00449-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-021-00449-4

[3] X. Guo and C.-T. Ma, “Quantifying quantum entanglement in two-qubit mixed state from connected correlator,” 2023, Preprint, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4533663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4533663

[4] D. Popescu and I. Popa, “The option for the universe of consumption and the 'Efficient consumer response' philosophy,” J. Eastern Europe Res. Bus.Econ., pp. 1–13, 2012, doi: 10.5171/2012.623809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5171/2012.623809

[5] G. G. Guerreschi, “Fast simulation of quantum algorithms using circuit optimization,” Quantum, vol. 6, p. 706, 2022, doi: 10.22331/q-2022-05-03-706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-05-03-706

[6] H. V. Kummara, “Quantum machine learning: An application of quantum support vector machines for financial data classification,”2025, Preprint, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5172167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5172167

[7] J. Chen et al., “Performance evaluation of cooperative spectrum sensing algorithm based on Quantum Manta Ray algorithm,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 185169–185180, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3416464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3416464

[8] K. K. Sahu, “Classical vs. quantum search: Experimental performance analysis of Grover's algorithm on real IBM quantum hardware,” 2025, Preprint,doi: 10.36227/techrxiv.176705167.72597149/v1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.176705167.72597149/v1

[9] A. Patiño-Saucedo et al., “Empirical study on the efficiency of spiking neural networks with axonal delays, and algorithm-hardware benchmarking,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst., 2023, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/ISCAS46773.2023.10181778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS46773.2023.10181778

[10] S. Arakaki, M. Hirokawa, and H. Watanabe, “Toward design and implementation of a quantum-classical hybrid computing system,” in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Quantum Softw., 2025, pp. 112–119, doi: 10.5220/0013542300004525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0013542300004525

[11] G. Lakshmi G. and U. Kuppusamy, “A review of current imaging techniques for histopathology-based breast cancer diagnosis with comparative insights using machine learning and deep learning models and its challenges and future directions,” Peer J. Comput. Sci., vol. 12, e3645, Apr. 2026, doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3645

[12] “References and reviews,” JAMA: J. Amer. Med. Assoc., vol. 211, no. 11, p. 1871, 1970, doi: 10.1001/jama.1970.03170110073036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1970.03170110073036

[13] A. Bennakhi, G. T. Byrd, and P. Franzon, “Analyzing quantum circuit depth reduction with ancilla qubits in MCX gates,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Quantum Comput. Eng., 2024, pp. 510–511, doi: 10.1109/QCE60285.2024.10380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/QCE60285.2024.10380

[14] T. M. Madden, “Oöphoritis: Its causes and treatment,” Dublin J. Med. Sci., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 186–193, 1892, doi: 10.1007/BF02958423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02958423

[15] L. Mohamed, “Quantum matrix algorithm for electronic structure simulation: A novel approach to quantum many-body problems using superposition and entanglement,” 2026, Preprint, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6438340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6438340

[16] D. C. Rowland, H. A. Obenhaus, E. R. Skytøen, Q. Zhang, C. G. Kentros, E. I. Moser, and M.-B. Moser, “Functional properties of stellate cells in medial entorhinal cortex layer II,” eLife, vol. 7, e36664, Sep. 2018, doi:10.7554/eLife.36664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36664

[17] A. Alhammadi, “A computationally-efficient hybrid quantum-classical algorithm for robust classification in high-complexity data environments on commodity hardware,” 2025, Preprint, doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7508439/v1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7508439/v1

[18] M. K. Pasupuleti, “Next-gen quantum chips: Breakthroughs in superconducting and topological qubits,” in Quantum Comput. Chips: Advances Superconducting Topological Qubits, 2025, pp. 91–100, doi: 10.62311/nesx/97977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62311/nesx/97977

[19] R. Rovere de Santi, “A brief review of recent advances in the use of optical fibres to enhance readout and increase the number of physical qubits in superconducting quantum computers,” in Opt. Technologies Advancing Communication, Sens., Comput. Sys., 2025, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1007572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1007572

[20] M. Bayimbetova, “How can be put 'learner-oriented assessment' in practice?,” Ренессанс в парадигме новаций образования и технологий в XXI веке, no. 1, pp. 198–199, 2022, doi: 10.47689/innovations-in-edu-vol-iss1-pp198-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47689/innovations-in-edu-vol-iss1-pp198-199

[21] B. Staffler, M. Berning, K. M. Boergens, A. Gour, P. V. D Smagt, and M. Helmstaedter, “SynEM, automated synapse detection for connectomics,” eLife, vol. 6, e26414, Jul. 2017, doi:10.7554/eLife.26414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26414

[22] A. Ayoub, “The architecture of intelligent governance (AIG): A conceptual framework for integration AI, quantum computing, and global resource resilience,” Sustainability, vol. 18, no. 5, p. 2312, 2026, doi: 10.3390/su18052312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052312

[23] A. Raval and R. Oza, “Advancing AI with quantum computing: Synergies between quantum neural networks and quantum reinforcement learning,” in A. Ghosh, S. Dutta, A. K. Das, V. K. Shukla, and F. Moreira (eds), Quantum Mach. Learn. Ind. Automat. Inf. Sys. Eng. Manage., vol 65. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-99786-0_14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99786-0_14