Simulation of an SDN Network using Fognetsimpp and Performance Comparison of SDN Network with a Conventional Network
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijcs/2020/v5/i2-3/152554Keywords:
Latency
, Link Failure, Packet Loss, Preprogrammed, SDN, Speed of Transmission, Traditional Network.Manuscript Received, April 5, 2020, Revised, May 2, Accepted, May 10, 2020.Abstract
Software Defined Network (SDN) is becoming popular and many companies are trying to switch from traditional network to other sources such as SDN, cloud etc. SDN is the best alternative to traditional network because it can be automated and preprogrammed as per needs. This paper simulates an SDN network with the help of an opensource software. The results show that it performs better than conventional network. The metrics taken for comparison are latency, link failure, packet loss, and the speed of transmission.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2020-06-30
How to Cite
Naveen, D., & Khavya, K. (2020). Simulation of an SDN Network using Fognetsimpp and Performance Comparison of SDN Network with a Conventional Network. Indian Journal of Computer Science, 5(2&3), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijcs/2020/v5/i2-3/152554
Issue
Section
Articles
References
K. Khavya and T. Vairam, “A comparative study on conventional network and software defined network,†Indian J. of Comput. Sci., vol. 4, no. 6, 2019.
Github. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/rtqayyum/fognetsimpp/blob/master/README.md
T. Qayyum, A. W. Malik, M. A. K. Khattak, O. Khalid, and S. U. Khan, “FogNetSim++: A toolkit for modelling and simulation of distributed fog environment,†IEEE Access, 6, 63570-63583, 2018
D. Gopi, S., Cheng, and R. C. Huck, “Comparative analysis of SDN and conventional networks using routing protocols,†In 2017 Int. Conf. on Comput., Inform. and Telecommunication Syst. (CITS) (pp. 108-112). IEEE, July, 2017. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CITS.2017.8035305