Stock Market Reactions to Automotive Product Launches : An Event Study of India’s Leading Manufacturers

Authors

  •   Arnav Chowdhury Assistant Professor, Acropolis Faculty of Management and Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4732-331X
  •   Megha Jain Assistant Professor, Prestige Institute of Business Management, Indore, Scheme No. 54, Indore - 452 010, Madhya Pradesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2025/v12i4/175849

Keywords:

event study, abnormal returns, automotive product launches, Indian stock market, passenger vehicles, market efficiency, cumulative abnormal return.
JEL Classification Codes : G12, G14, L62
Publishing Chronology: Paper Submission Date : November 12, 2025 ; Paper sent back for Revision : November 25, 2025 ; Paper Acceptance Date : November 30, 2025

Abstract

This study examined whether major passenger-vehicle product launch announcements by Tata Motors, Mahindra and Mahindra, Maruti Suzuki, and Hyundai Motor India generated abnormal stock-market returns in India during 2015–2025, and whether investor reactions differed by segment (EVs vs. premium SUVs). It applied an event-study design in which abnormal returns were estimated using a market model and then aggregated into cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) over a symmetric –30 to +30 trading-day window around each launch. A standard market model event-study framework was implemented to estimate expected (normal) returns and derive abnormal returns attributable to the announcement. These were then aggregated to compute cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) over the event window. Temporal regression-based diagnostics were used to assess structural change, and ANOVA was used to test whether mean CARs differed across product segments.

Overall market receptivity was weak, with a mean CAR of −0.36% (p = 0.10) and 63.3% of launches showing negative CARs. A premium SUV launch (XUV 3XO) exhibited stronger positive performance relative to mass-market and EV launches, and a structural break was observed around 2020, indicating relatively improved post-pandemic market reactions. The findings suggested that while product launches remained central to long-term strategy, announcement effects did not reliably translate into immediate positive trading signals for investors. Managers were advised to emphasize execution and delivery of premium innovations rather than relying on short-run announcement-driven valuation effects. The study contributed emerging-market evidence by isolating announcement-related valuation effects in India’s automotive sector and comparing market responses to ICE-model introductions versus EV launches across a decade of product-cycle transitions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Chowdhury, A., & Jain, M. (2025). Stock Market Reactions to Automotive Product Launches : An Event Study of India’s Leading Manufacturers. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 12(4), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2025/v12i4/175849

References

1) Asquith, P., Healy, P., & Palepu, K. (1989). Earnings and stock splits. The Accounting Review, 64(3), 387–403. https://jstor.org/stable/247596

2) Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1997). Detecting long‐run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(3), 341–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00890-2

3) Clark, E., Dehority, T., Lefanowicz, C. E., & Sanger, T. (2016). Market reaction to product innovation announcements. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(3), 270–286.

4) Dobni, D., & Racine, M. (2016). Investors' images of the stock market: Antecedents and consequences. Financial Services Review, 25(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v25i1.3258

5) Fang, L., & Peress, J. (2009). Media coverage and the cross‐section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 2023–2052. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01493.x

6) Foerster, S. R., & Karolyi, G. A. (1999). The effects of market segmentation and investor recognition on asset prices: Evidence from foreign stocks listing in the United States. The Journal of Finance, 54(3), 981–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00134

7) MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13–39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2729691

8) Narayan, P. K., Narayan, S., & Mishra, S. (2013). Has the structural break slowed down growth rates of stock markets? Economic Modelling, 30, 595–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.10.001

9) Pelegov, D. V., & Chanaron, J.-J. (2023). Electric car market analysis using open data: Sales, volatility assessment, and forecasting. Sustainability, 15(1), 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010399

10) Rangan, S. (1998). Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 50(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00033-6

11) Salameh, H., & Albahsh, R. (2011). Testing the efficient market hypothesis at the semi strong level in Palestine Stock Exchange - Event study of the mandatory disclosure. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 69, 45–50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282725486

12) Singh, P., & Dixit, A. K. (2025). Impact of behavioural biases on investment decisions of retail investors: Evidence from Indian capital markets. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(6), 1–13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398822318