Does Low Price-Earnings Multiple Fetch Higher Scrip Returns in India?
Keywords:
Equity Investment Strategy, Glamour Stocks vs. Value Stocks, Price-Earnings Multiple, Price-Earnings Ratio.Abstract
The study investigates the relationship between the Price-Earnings multiple and the scrip returns in India. A sample size of 80 companies comprising of 8 different industries listed in Bombay Stock Exchange were taken up for a time period of 08 years from January 1st, 2001 to December 31st, 2008. Rather than a single holding period, the study considers multiple holding periods ranging from six months to four years. Eight different portfolios were constructed on the basis of the price-earnings of the scrips and their returns were compared. The study finds an inverse relationship between the price-earnings multiple and scrip returns, which levers up as the duration of the holding period increases. The variability of the scrip returns is explained to a greater extent by the linear relationship between the price-earnings and scrip returns during relatively longer holding periods (two to four years). It is also identified that the annualized returns of the low price-earnings based portfolios (value stocks) are greater than the high price-earnings based portfolios (glamour stocks) and the paired t test confirmed that the holding period duration of four or three years instead of six months or one year earn significantly higher annualized returns.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Aras, G; Yilmaz, M,K. (2008), “Price Earnings Ratio, Dividend Yield And Market To Book Ratio To Predict Return On Stock Market: Evidence From Emerging Market.†Journal of Global Business and Technology, Vol.4, No.1, Spring, pp. 21-30.
Basu S (1977), "Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price-Earning Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Hypothsis", Journal of Finance, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 663-682.
Bhargava V, Malhotra D K, (2006), “Do price-earnings ratios drive stock values?†The Journal of Portfolio Management, Autumn, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 86-93.
Campbell, John Y. and Robert J. Shiller (1998), .Valuation Ratios and the Long-Run Stock Market Outlook., Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 11-26.
Dreman, D.N. (1998), Contrarian Investment Strategies: the Next Generation, Simon & Schuster, New York, pp. 265-98.
Fisher, K.L., and Statman, M. (2000), “Cognitive Biases in Market Forecasts.†The Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 27, Fall, pp. 72-81.
Fuller, R.J., Huberts, L.C. 7 Levinson, M.J., (1993), “Returns to E/P strategies, Higgeldy Piggeldy Growth, Analysts' Forecast errors, and Omitted risk Factors.†Journal of Portfolio management, 1993, winter: pp.13-34.
Guler Aras And Mustafa Kemal Yilmaz (2008), “Price-Earnings Ratio, Dividend Yield, And Market-To-Book Ratio To Predict Return On Stock Market: Evidence From The Emerging Markets.†Journal of Global Business and Technology, Volume. 4, Number 1, pp.105-112.
Gupta, SP., (1994), Statistical Methods, Sultan Chand & Sons, New Delhi, pp. E10.1-61.
Levis, M. (1989), “Stock Market Anomaliesâ€. Journal of Banking and Finance, Volume.13 (SI), pp. 675-96.
Lo, A. [Ed.], (1996), Market Efficiency: Stock Market Behaviour in Theory and Practice, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., London, pp. 326-93.
Nicholson, S.F., (1960), “Price-Earning Ratios.†Financial Analysts Journal, 16(4): pp. 43-45.
Oppenheimer, H. (1984), “A Test of Ben Graham's stock Selection criteria.†Financial Analyst Journal, September- October, pp. 27-36.
Park, S., (2000), “What does the P-E ratio Mean?†The Journal of Investing, Vol.9, Fall, pp. 45-56.