Subsidized Microfinance and Sustainability of Self-Help Groups (SHGs): Observations from North East India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2015/v9i5/71443Keywords:
Microfinance
, Subsidized Programs, Self-Help-Groups, Subsidy, SustainabilityC21
, C22, G21, H23Paper Submission Date
, July 20, 2014, Paper sent back for Revision, December 9, Paper Acceptance Date, March 4, 2015.Abstract
In India, the subsidized scheme is one of the variants of microfinance introduced by the Central Government and similar subsidy based microfinance schemes have also been introduced by other donor agencies. The decadal growth of the number of subsidized SHGs and loan size under these schemes indicate the fact that SHGs are more attracted towards subsidy. However, the key question that has been asked in many research studies is about the relationship of subsidy with that of long-term sustainability of MFIs/SHGs. With the help of randomly selected 150 subsidized SHGs operating in one of the eight states of North East India, that is, Meghalaya, the study established that subsidy has negatively influenced the long-term sustainability of the SHGs. In case the subsidy is withdrawn, the SHGs would be less sustainable-operationally as well as financially. Furthermore, the withdrawal of subsidy would increase the onward lending rate manifold so as to discourage the members to take any loan from the group, thus threatening the entire program.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Adams, D. W., Graham, D., & Von Pischke, J. D. (1984). Undermining rural development with cheap credit. Boulder, CO: West view Press.
Adams, D.W., & Von Pischke, J.D. (1992). Microenterprise credit programs: Déjà Vu. World Development, 20 (10), 1463-1470.
Asian Development Bank. (ADB). (2000). Rural Asia : Beyond the green revolution. Manila, Philippines : Asian Development Bank.
Aveh, F.K., Krah, R.Y., & Dadzie, P.S. (2013). An evaluation of sustainability and subsidy dependence of microfinance institutions in Ghana. International Business and Management, 6 (1), 55-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2Fj.ibm.1923842820130601.1090
Chinomona, R., & Tam, L.T. (2013). Microfinance outreach and the microfinance institutions (MFIs) sustainability: Evidence from Vietnam. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 3(1), 5-16.
Conning, J. (1998). Outreach, sustainability, and leverage in monitored and peer monitored lending. Journal of Development Economics, 60(1), 51 - 77.
Cull, R., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2007). Financial performance and outreach: A global analysis of leading micro banks. The Economic Journal, 117(517), 107 †133.
Das, R. M. (2004). Microfinance through SHGs: A boon for the rural poor. Kurukshetra, 32 (4), 43-47.
Ellis, F. (1992). Agricultural policies in developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hulme, D., & Mosley, P. (1996). Finance against poverty: Effective institutions for lending to small farmers and micro-enterprises in developing countries (Vol.1, p. 106). London : Routledge.
Kinde, B.A. (2012). Financial sustainability of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Ethiopia. European Journal of Business and Management, 4 (15), 1-10. Retrieved from http://pakacademicsearch.com/pdf-files/ech/517/1-10%20Vol%204,%20No%2015%20%282012%29.pdf
Micro Banking Bulletin (MBB). (1998). Highlights of MFI survey (Issue No-2, pp. 1-50). Boulder, CO: Economics Institute.
Meghalaya Rural Development Society. (MRDS). (2009-10 to 2010-11). MRDS annual report, Shillong.
Morduch, J. (1999). The microfinance promise. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4),1569 - 1614.
Morduch, J. (2000). The microfinance schism. World Development, 28 (4), 617 - 629.
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD). (2010). Status of micro finance in India, 2009-10. Mumbai : NABARD Publication.
Nawaz, A. (2010). Issues in subsidies and sustainability of microfinance: An empirical investigation (CEB Working Paper 10/010). Brussels : Centre Emile Bernheim, Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management.
North Eastern Region Community Resource Management Project (NERCORMP). (2010). NERCORMP annual report, Shillong.
Pulley, R. V. (1989). Making the poor creditworthy: A case study of the integrated rural development program in India (World Bank Discussion Paper 58). Washington DC: World Bank.
Quinones, B. (1997). Evaluation of the linkage banking programme in India. Bangkok : Asia Pacific Rural and Agricultural Credit Association Standards.
Rahman, A. (1999). Micro-credit initiatives for equitable and sustainable development: Who pays? World Development, 27 (1), 67 - 82.
Robinson, M. (2001). The microfinance revolution: Sustainable finance for the poor. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Rosenberg, R. (2009). Measuring results of microfinance institutions: Minimum indicators that donors and investors should track - A technical guide. Washington, DC: CGAP.
Sarkar, D. (2008). Indian microfinance: Lessons from Bangladesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(1), 18-20.
Seabright, P. (1989). Failure of livestock investments under IRDP: Evidence from two villages in Tamil Nadu. Economic and Political Weekly, 24 (39), 2203 - 2208.
Seibel, H.D., & Parhusip, U. (1990). Financial innovations for microenterprises – linking formal and informal institutions. In M. Harper (ed.) Microfinance: Evolution, achievement and challenges. London : ITDG Publication.
Small Enterprise Education and Promotion. (SEEP). (1995). Financial ratio analysis of microfinance institutions. New York: Pact Publication.
State Level Bankers' Committee (SLBC). (2010). SLBC annual report. Shillong.
United Nations (2009, January 15). The millennium development goals report. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/MDG_Report_2009_ENG.pdf
Yaron, J. (1992). Successful rural finance institutions (Discussion Paper No. 150). Washington DC : The World Bank.
Yaron, J., Benjamin, M.P., & Piperk, G.L. (1997). Rural finance, issues, design and best practices. Environmentally and socially sustainable development studies and monographs series 14. Rural Development, Washington DC: World Bank.
