Performance of Conventional and Sustainable Index in Pre and During the COVID-19 Pandemic : A Comparative Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i5/172736Keywords:
COVID-19
, pandemic, NIFTY 100, CSR, ESG, sustainable development goals, EGARCH, returnJELClassification Codes
, G10, G11, G15Paper Submission Date
, July 5, 2022, Paper sent back for Revision, January 15, 2023, Paper Acceptance Date, March 5, Paper Published Online, May 15, 2023Abstract
Purpose : There has been a significant increase in the demand for ESG (environmental, social, and governance) investment by investors in recent years. Investors are recognizing that companies that prioritize ESG factors in their operations are more likely to be sustainable and resilient in the long term. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the ESG-responsible firms are performing better than the other firms in the pre-COVID and during the COVID periods. The paper also tried to investigate the impact of COVID-19 cases on the index movement.
Methodology : The study employed the descriptive analysis on the financial data of NSE NIFTY 500 and NIFTY 100 Enhanced ESG index. The EGARCH model was applied to estimate the effect of COVID-19 on the volatility of the NIFTY 100 Enhanced ESG index.
Findings : The results showed that there was no leverage effect in the ESG index in both periods. That means that the ESG Index can act as a cushion during the pandemic period. The ESG Index outperformed the conventional market index, thus acting as a COVID-19 safe asset class. This gives an opportunity to investors and fund managers to diversify their risk by acting sustainably responsible for society.
Practical Implications : This study compared the performance of ESG-indexed firms with that of other firms in the pre-COVID and during COVID time period to check whether there was any difference between them. This study provided empirical evidence for practitioners, policymakers, and academicians in support of ESG investment as it showed that the ESG Index performed better than the conventional index during the COVID period.
Originality : This study used secondary data to study the performance of the EGS firms in the pre and during COVID period in order to compare with the other firms. In the context of India, this study may be the first one to compare the performance of the ESG firms with the normal firms in the pre and during the COVID period.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., Yang, S., & Zhang, C. (2020). Resiliency of environmental and social stocks: An analysis of the exogenous COVID-19 market crash. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 9(3), 593–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfaa011
Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), 3910. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3910
Andrews, M. A., Areekal, B., Rajesh, K. R., Krishnan, J., Suryakala, R., Krishnan, B., Muraly, C. P., & Santhosh, P. V. (2020). First confirmed case of COVID-19 infection in India: A case report. The Indian Journal of Medical Research, 151(5), 490–492. https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fijmr.IJMR_2131_20
Beloskar, V. D., & Nageswara Rao, S. V. (2023). Did ESG save the day? Evidence from India during the COVID-19 crisis. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 30, 73–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-022-09369-5
Borghesi, R., Houston, J. F., & Naranjo, A. (2014). Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests. Journal of Corporate Finance, 26, 164– 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.03.008
Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
Carpenter, G., & Wyman, O. (2009). Shedding light on responsible investment: Approaches, returns, impacts. Mercer Investment Consulting. https://www.sustainablefinance.ch/upload/cms/user/Shedding_light_on_responsible_inves tment_free_version.pdf
Demers, E., Hendrikse, J., Joos, P., & Lev, B. (2020). ESG didn't immunize stocks against the COVID-19 market crash. Available at SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3675920
Dey, K., & Brown, A. (2021). Indian stock market's response in five-phases to the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 8(1–2), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.17010/10.17010/ijrcm/2021/v8i1-2/160230
Dey, S. K., & Sharma, D. (2022). Covid-19 and the Indian stock market behaviour: Do government initiatives really matter? Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 9(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2022/v9i1/170402
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
Ding, W., Levine, R., Lin, C., & Xie, W. (2021). Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 802–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.005
Engelhardt, N., Ekkenga, J., & Posch, P. (2021). ESG ratings and stock performance during the COVID-19 crisis. Sustainability, 13(13), 7133. https://www.mdpi.com/2071- 1050/13/13/7133
Estrada, M. A., Koutronas, E., & Lee, M. (2020). Stagpression: The economic and financial impact of Covid-19 pandemic. Available at SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3593144
Fauzi, H., Mahoney, L. S., & Abdul Rahman, A. (2007). The link between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Indonesian companies. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 1(1), 149–159.
Ferrell, A., Hao, L., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.003
Hartzmark, S. M., & Sussman, A. B. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789–2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841
Hwang, J., Kim, H., & Jung, D. (2021). The effect of ESG activities on financial performance during the COVID-19 pandemic — Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 13(20), 11362. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011362
Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1492- 2
Kim, S., & Döttling, R. (2020). Sustainability preferences under stress: Mutual fund flows during COVID-19. VOXEU and CEPR. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/sustainabilitypreferences- under-stress-mutual-fund-flows-during-covid-19
Mandelbrot, B. (1963). New methods in statistical economics. Journal of Political Economy, 71(5), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1086/258792
Mangala Minutha, V., & Jagannathan, U. K. (2022). A study on the impact of COVID-19 on alternative investment funds in India. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 9(2–3), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2022/v9i2-3/172551
Miyakoshi, T. (2002). ARCH versus information-based variances: Evidence from the Tokyo stock market. Japan and the World Economy, 14(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0922-1425(02)00003-8
Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260
Rasimäki, E. (2021). The market value of ESG during COVID-19 market crash in Europe (Thesis). Aalto University School of Business, Finland.
Rubbaniy, G., Khalid, A. A., Rizwan, M. F., & Ali, S. (2022). Are ESG stocks safe-haven during COVID-19? Studies in Economics and Finance, 39(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF- 08-2021-0320
Siew, R. Y., Balatbat, M. C., & Carmichael, D. G. (2013). The relationship between sustainability practices and financial performance of construction companies. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/20466091311325827
Singh, N. P., Makhija, P., & Chacko, E. (2021). Sustainable investment and the COVID-19 effect - volatility analysis of ESG index. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 13(4), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2021.118620
Tripathi, V., & Bhandari, V. (2015). Socially responsible stocks: A boon for investors in India. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 12(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-03-2014-0021
Tripathi, V., & Kaur, A. (2020). Socially responsible investing: Performance evaluation of BRICS nations. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 17(4), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-02-2020-0020
Vadithala, U. K., & Tadoori, G. (2021). Market efficiency of ESG and traditional indices-pre and post COVID analysis of NSE indices. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 9(3), 2712–2726. http://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2103332.pdf
Veeravel, V., Karthikeyan, K., & Remiya, P. R. (2021). Is the Indian stock market affected by COVID-19? : Evidence from cases or fatalities. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 8(3), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2021/v8i3/167957
Vevek, S., Selvam, M., & Sivaprakkash, S. (2022). The persistence of volatility in nifty 50. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 9(2–3), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2022/v9i2-3/172549
Wei-Chong, C., See-Nie, L., & Ung, S. N. (2011). Macroeconomics uncertainty and performance of GARCH models in forecasting Japan stock market volatility. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(1), 200 – 208.
Widya Mitra, A., & Pria Anas, E. (2021). Impact of ESG/corporate social responsibility on company performance before and during covid 19 crisis: Study of listed companies in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Technology Management, 3(2), 143–155. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbtm/article/view/14542
Zhao, X., & Murrell, A. J. (2016). Revisiting the corporate social performance-financial performance link: A replication of Waddock and Graves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(11), 2378–2388. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2579
