Sustainability Reporting of Indian Companies and the Adherence to GRI Disclosure Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2022/v16i9/172160Keywords:
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
, Social Disclosure, Sustainability Reporting, GRI Disclosure Framework, Compliance.JEL Classifications Codes
, M14, M16, M41Paper Submission Date
, August 20, 2021, Paper sent back for Revision, May 26, 2022, Paper Acceptance Date, June 20, Paper Published Online, September 15, 2022Abstract
Given that all significant stakeholders expect companies to be transparent with financial and nonfinancial disclosures, companies are under increasing pressure and are also morally obliged to adhere to voluntary disclosure frameworks. In this regard, the GRI disclosure framework (non-financials) has recently attracted a lot of attention, and listed Indian companies are about to comply with this disclosure framework. Accordingly, this study attempted to gain insights into the extent to which recorded Indian companies adhere to the GRI disclosure framework. For this purpose, we captured the sustainability reports of Indian listed companies from the GRI Sustainability Disclosure Database (SDD) for a span ranging from 20 years from 2000 onwards. The results from this study indicated that of the million listed companies in India, only a few (425 companies) submitted their sustainability reports with GRI in compliance with the guidelines. However, another interesting finding is that majority of these compliant companies are long-listed and from the ESSI industry classification. As GRI disclosure compliance gives away companies’ ethical solid governance practices, it is pretty surprising that exceptionally few Indian companies choose to do so consistently. In line with the findings of this study, we discussed practical and research implications.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Abd Rahman, N. H., Zain, M. M., & Alâ€Haj, N. H. (2011). CSR disclosures and its determinants: Evidence from Malaysian government link companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111111141486
Adams, C. A., Hill, W.-Y., & Roberts, C. B. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: Legitimating corporate behavior? The British Accounting Review, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1997.0060
Ahamed, N. (2014). Multiple directorship & interlock: An empirical study of its impact on firms' financial performance. Indian Journal of Finance, 8(10), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2014/v8i10/71848
Baskin, J. (2006). Value, values and sustainability: Corporate responsibility in emerging market companies. Available at SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1094573
Bedenik, N. O., & Barišić, P. (2019). Nonfinancial reporting: Theoretical and empirical evidence. In, M. Sarfraz, M. I. Abdullah, A. Rauf, & S. G. M. Shah (eds.), Sustainable management practice. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.87159
Behal, V., & Gupta, M. (2022). Reporting of corporate social responsibility practices: An evidence from Indian BSE-listed companies. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(3), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i3/165633
Bhatia, A., & Tuli, S. (2014). An empirical analysis of sustainability disclosure practices: Evidence from India and China. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 3(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975214542057
Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2008). Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 685–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9658-z
Chan, M. C., Watson, J., & Woodliff, D. (2014). Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1887-8
Charumathi, B., & Ramesh, L. (2017). Do social and environmental disclosures increase firm value? Evidence from Indian companies. Indian Journal of Finance, 11(4), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2017/v11i4/112628
Cormier, D., & Gordon, I. M. (2001). An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(5), 587–617. https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000006264
Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000339617
Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90001-8
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures — A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852
Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263511
Guthrie, J., & Farneti, F. (2008). GRI sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organizations. Public Money & Management, 28(6), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00670.x
Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J. R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 497–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9721-4
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jose, A. M., Jose, M. T., & Suresh, G. (2022). Impact of corporate governance on financial performance of Nifty 50 companies: An empirical analysis. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 8(3), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2021/v8i3/167955
Kansal, M., Joshi, M., & Batra, G.S. (2014). Theory of the firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Advances in Accounting, 30(1), 217–229.
Kolk, A. (2010). Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.001
Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
Mohtsham Saeed, M., & Arshad, F. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of competitive advantage: The mediating role of social capital and reputational capital. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 19(4), 219 – 232.
Paine, L. S., & Srinivasan, S. (2019). A guide to the big ideas and debates in corporate governance. Harvard Business Review, 2 – 19.
Passah, H., Ninan, G., & Anuradha, P. (2020). Asymmetric effects of sustainability indices in emerging Asian countries. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 7(4), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2020/v7i4/157912
Preuss, L., & Barkemeyer, R. (2011). CSR priorities of emerging economy firms: Is Russia a different shape of BRIC? Corporate Governance, 11(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701111159226
Quick, R. (2008). Voluntary sustainability reporting practices in Germany: A study on reporting quality. Portuguese Journal of Accounting and Management, 5(1), 7–35.
Roberts, D.H., & Koeplin, J.P. (2007). Sustainability reporting practices in Portugal: Greenwashing or triple bottom line. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 6(9), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v6i9.3403
SDD - GRI Database. (2018). Globalreporting.org. http://database.globalreporting.org/
Tuli, S. (2013). A comparative study of sustainability disclosure practices of India and USA. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 9(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X13483509
Wilburn, K., & Wilburn, R. (2013). Using Global Reporting Initiative indicators for CSR programs. Journal of Global Responsibility, 4(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/20412561311324078